Notes for raw inventories of canons Cb.
From 1990 Feb and Apr, corrs. 1991 Aug. -- A few corrs. 2002 Apr, plus some
additions in [...].

Cb: Chapter-divisions and chapter-rubrics.
Chapter-divisions are assumed where large initials, or other salient
   markings, occur. Paragraph-signs within such chapters are ignored.
Extra text: "(R:)" means headings distinguished as such. "(T:)" mean
   chapter-beginnings made visible by various means such as rubrics,
   large initials, etc. -  New-lines in the transcription are only for
   convenience.
======================================================================

Ad:
first impression: much like Q, and a 13th-c Italian hand too.
Many errors, and several blanks where the scribe could not read the exemplar.
No glosses, not even corrections.

B:
f.84vb, gloss, motus of 8th sphere 9ø17'44".
Table Cb166 embedded in text.
[f.89vb (affter Cb211) an "explicit", no connection with text.
Figures appear copied from Pq or vice versa (Apr.1987)]


Bn:
Table Cb59 within chapter Cb52-57.  Generally I do not mention the dis-
placements of this table.  -  Many small textual variants,
generally trivializations. - No headings, except for a gloss and an
accidental intercalation (Cb218).
[50b and 210: large initials but no newline (Apr. 1987)]
120: last clause "et habebis -- praeteritas" omitted.
125: last clause = "fac ut supra dictum est in sinu et
declinatione".
166: a table.
185: + id a loco lunae in longitudine.
218 beginning, "Cum autem apparitionem et occultationem
planetarum et primo trium superiorum placuerit", original heading
incorporated.
225: + "quod patebit..."

Cz:
Q-type. No hdgs except the title.
Alinea-markers within chapters, not noted.
70 (f.5 bottom): first bit of chap. repeated (with variants),
then deleted.
85a: chapter indicated before this paragraph.
142: -- ab initio arietis.
166: list, not table.
228: present.

Cp:
33: made up as if for large initial, which was not executed.
59: blank space for table.
94: om. "et residuum...", blank space.
95, 102, 111, 125, 144: initial omitted.
166, list, not table.

Cg:
Mixture of Cb (revised) and ?Theorica Planetarum Gerardi.


Ch: No rubrics. Text mixed, or intermediate between old and young versions.
. 48: on f.101r in context.
. 49-50a: on inserted leaf opposite f.101r, in main hand.
. 51b: bottom of 101r, wrongly inserted after 48, main hand.
. 49-50a, first line, bottom of 101r, same hand? No doubt
.     a first attempt, before the extra leaf was employed.
. 51a: on f.101r, following 48 in context. Then begins c.52.
166: list, not table.
Space for figure after 208a; 208b has no large initial.

Cj:  Text appears bad.
Some rubrics marred by durchblutung. The illegible parts, and those
   disappearing into the binding, have been enclosed in <>. Where rubrics
   are absent, this is marked with "vacat" or "none" as appr.; still the
   chapters are distinguished by means of large initials.
Alternative headings for 17 and 28.
20 continued into 26 on same page. Same for 30 and 33, and for 36 and 44.
59: table located within c.52-57.
166: list, not table; nevertheless the rubric "Tabula..." in the usual
     rubricator's hand.
Before 236, apparently a change of hand, but the text-hd. seems to revert
later on.  236+, space for large initials, which were not executed. The text
is very sloppy.  - c.252 until "sinus 15 gr."; scribe left off on a recto
page, verso blank.

Cm: good text, old-fashioned.
21: present.
31-32, no break.
Between 78a and 78b is an alinea-sign, but this is found elsewhere.
166: "Et haec sunt Geuzaar planetarum" is replaced by the rubric recorded,
   then follows a table like the one in the print.

Co, ADDITIONAL:
67-71 left out, the text just continues.

Du:
Some rubrics partly hidden in the binding, hidden parts in <>.
Main text seems aberrantly worded in many details.
Chapter-breaks were only assumed where there is space for large initials.
   There are further rubrics within context, thus,
   171a: Docet aequare.
   174:  Docuit invenire horam coniunctionis, nunc docet invenire locum.
   184:  De hora visibilis coniunctionis
   217:  Ut scias quando in mane possit apparere aliquid(!) trium planetarum
superiorum.
   etc.  -  These have been taken as glosses.
21: present.
31-32: no break.
42,44: rubrics run together, distinction is tentative.
139+ (f.13v): example for AD 1265, showing that these canons were
   seriously used together with AD-type tables. There are some Toulouse
   tables later in this ms.
167-9: early example of these canons being in their later place. The ms.
   seems to be English (but "oscurabitur", 191 rubr., f.19r).
50b: present, continuing 50a.

E:
[f. 122v-123r missing in film, containing Cb83...Cb122.]
59: the table stands within c.52-57.
166: a proper table, placed at bottom of page.
206: absent in its place.

Eb:
There is a paragraph-numbering, not recorded.
Glosses or supplements for the rubrics, all in other hands, are in <<>>.
   They were recorded arbitrarily.
59: table stands within c.52-57.
166: a table.
206: cancelled with a "va--cat".

Ef:
Rubrics faint, and present only until f.120v; from c.223a on, only black
  chapter-headings are seen. Of the latter, the marginal ones are shown
  in <<>>, the rest are not marked. Probably, however, all the black
  headings are in the same hand.  - Main text looks good. Of the chapters
  to be expected in an older version, only c.49-51a were not found.
The canons are in disorder. Of the unexpected transitions, only the
  one between c.94 and c.230 coincides with a leaf-break. So the disturbance
  must be due to a mixed-up exemplar.
After 17-20 is another version of 17-20 in an involved phrasing. Perhaps
  this is the original translation, and 17-20 was revised by a Latinist.
At end of 35, gloss "Quidam libri loco huius litterae 'incipe a 7 feria'
  habent 'remota unitate', quaere septimo folio (mark)". The mark is on 125v.
35 continued into 127 on same page. 35 is followed by the rubric "Inventio
  annorum Arabum per annos Christi" as if for a normal continuation. This
  rubric was deleted, and 127 carries its own rubric.
169 ends "si sedet in deo" like H1.
166: list, not table.
51b, then 236: so in fact this version is a mix-up of a normal one.
59: table below, within 64-66.

Eh:
Rubrics faint in film. Emendations (in a black contemporary cursive) are
  put into <<>>.
166: a proper table, a little before the end of this paragraph.

Ej:
no rubrics.
21: present.
36: with a table "Differentia inter tempora", 10 entries.
47: present.
51b' = until "dicta sufficiant". -  51b" (="Nunc autem") begins with a
   large initial.
After 48 is the gloss "Quaere defectum trium canonum infra cum tali
   signo +", referring to an inserted leaf immediately following. This is
   in the glossator's hand, and contains 49-50a, 50b, 51a, 43 (from
   another exemplar, to judge by the presence of c.43), plus some more
   glosses in another hand; it begins with the reference "Isti duo
   canones habentur infra post 14 folia cum tali signo (mark)". This ref.
   is to f.20v, with 49-50b, 51a, in the text-hand.  -  The inserted leaf
   was NOT recorded.
59: Kardaga-table placed below, after c.60.
139 and 140 separate.
166: List of nodes in context, plus a table (with the same values) placed
   above within c.165.
Between 208a and 208b, new line but no large initial.
50b: adds "secundum Normannum non secundum path(a)m (=??)".
At the end there are several extra texts, interspersed with normal canons.
   I have transcribed all of them, since they are in the same hand as Cb,
   and since there is no obvious break in this collection.
The small theorica at the end is like the Theorica Planetarum (e.g. in the
   definition of the two kinds of 'aux'), and may be more primitive, cf.
   the defs. of 'stations'.  -  Says that Christmas has been shifted 10
   days, check Campanus' computus!  - T&K refers to Ambix VII(1959) 35-6
   for this piece.

Ek:
Part of the headings are very faint in the film.  There are occasional
   marginal extracts of contents, co-incident with the rubrics where
   this can be checked; but some of the notes are for mid-text, so probably
   they were not meant as models, and I have not used them.
Some of the first headings look like spontaneous transcripts of the text.
   E.g., c.64-66 fail to mention that the sines are versed, and so does
   the rubric.
166: a table, in its place.

Eq:
A few rubrics only, in different hands not here distinguished.
47: present.
140 (f.12rb), cursive note on Bologna.
166: a table, in its place.

Et:
Outer edges of leaves eroded, writing partly effaced.
Text lacks c.1-44, the trigonometrical part, etc., see description.
45-46: text appears abbreviated, but the phrasing is still specifically
   like the standard.
48 / 139, transition on same page, no mechanical disorder.
185: New line before this para., but no rubric nor prob. any initial.
The extra pieces are all in the same hand as the canons.

Es:
Some secondary corrections to the rubrics, noted only where they correct
   errors.  - Chapter-numbering, not recorded.
21: present.
166: clause "Et haec s. Geu. planetarum" omitted. The table is a
   proper one.
167-69: placed after 178. Ending "si deus voluerit et tua neglegentia non
   impediat, amen".
193: calculation re-done, with the wrong result 33 scds 36 thirds.

A:
"Hostendit", etc., often.
Chapter-numbering in a ?later hand.
32: starts "Si vero Persarum annos volueris invenire", echoed in the rubric;
   but the canon is about finding AH from APers.
166: vals. in context: not a table.
244: just room for a large initial.
259,260: blank space for rubrics, glosses in margin.
230-35: missing (remaining 1 1/2 col. of page is blank).

Fb:
Text bad in details.
59: table above, within 52-57.
206: no break from 205.
226-229: one piece, including 228.

T:
206: no break from 205.


Ff:
Of the pieces expected, Ff lacks 199a-c, 207-8b (figures of eclipses);
   232-5; 217(last bit)-220. The two latter omissions may be accidental.
Several canons are somewhat re-stated: examples, see below.
Rubrics often seem to be mere extracts of the incipits: specific
   instances are Cb167, 225.
Some texts for rubrics are both in situ and in the margin, others only
   in the margin, in a coeval hand. Those in <<>> are marginals.
   (The rubrics may have used the marginals, and failing these, may have
   paraphrased the text.) I use the marginal where there is no rubric,
   and quote the marginal when it differs from the rubric.
Abridgments like an(norum), Ar(abum), are plentiful, and are not marked
   in each instance.
59: Kardaga-table missing.
236: preamble re-stated as "Quia de sinu breviter et quasi de noto supra
   tractavimus, minus tamen sufficienter, cum etiam eius scientia valde
   sit necessaria ad ea quae de circularibus motibus hic traduntur, idcirco
   de ipso iterato determinantes perfectior danda est doctrina".
78b: room for the initial is inside the context, but there is a rubric and
   a small model letter as usual.
166' until "duorum latitudines"; 166'' from "Planetarum Ge(n)zahar hae
   sunt", then a list in text-form.
217: last 4 words omitted, rest of page blank.

Fj:
8: "In huius vero restitutionis" with large initial, but no rubric.
   Not recorded.
88: Continued from 87 with a C-sign; but the end of 87 had been lost,
   and is supplemented in the margin.
166' ends "horum duorum latitudines", omitting "et haec s.G. planetarum".
166" has the list of nodes (not a table).

Gr:
Chapter-numbering, here ignored, younger than one mid-14th-c. glossator's
   hand (cf. "32" on 15v).
A few chapter-hdgs. are in the main hand, others in a 14-15th-c. cursive
   here given in <<>>.
39/40: between these, Cb43 is inserted in mg., 14-15th-c. hand.
51b: mg., note 13-14th c., for intercalating 49+ and 51a+.
78b: there is a hdg., no doubt from the source, but no large initial.
166: table.
174: painted initial, smaller than the rest but with a normal minuscule
   model. No heading of either sort.
218: Marginal hdg. like the others; no initial.

Kr:
14: adds 1 line, "quia diebus -- supererit dies".
85a: to next chapter.
138b': until "dicta sufficiant"; 138b": from "Nunc vero".
166: text, not a table.
211+ and 214+ interchanged, no disturbance in this ms.
228: present.
236: preamble just "Quoniam igitur ad sinus demonstrationem praesens spectat
   intentio, primo videndum est quid sit sinus...".

Lf:
59: table above, within 52-57.

Lg:
59: table above, within 52-57.
166: a proper table, in its place.
228: present.

Lh:
some stage remarks among the glosses, perhaps from a commentary, e.g.:
  to 56: Capitulum secundum quosdam.
  to 72: 3'a pars principalis.
  to 98: 2'a pars de elevationibus.
  to 127: 3'a pars principalis.
91: heading at an unusual chapter-break, paraphrased from the text.
166: a proper table, in its place. Clause "Et haec s.G.pl." omitted.
Between 260 and 230, a vacat and the word "distincta", why?

Lm:
59: table below, within 60-61.
166': until l.8 "horum duorum latitudines", rest plus table absent.
214: the rubricator made the false start "Cum volueris ortus", cf. the
   main text.

Md:
166: list, not table.

Mf:
Southern hand, the rubrics show the Italian "qui". -  Spanish??
166: list, not table.
226: from here on, large initials were not made, but the hand and the
   main lay-out (including room for initials) remain as before.

Mv:
59: table above, within 52-57.
109,113: with pencilled exemplars below the cols., and appar. in another
   hand than the other rubrics, still contemp.
166: a proper table, within this chapter.
193-8: vertical strokes in text, distinguishing the single small rules.
   Same in 248-258 (demonstr. for sines), so the purpose is not specifically
   practical.
214: rubric in lower mg. (since there is no room in text), but in the
   same hand as the rest.
228: present.

Mp:
Chapter-numbering im ?main hand, starting afresh for each part.
166: a proper table.

Ma:  Italian or southern hand, "q(ui)" with horizontal stroke.
     (190c)-(201a) are gone.
115: added "i(ll)am praedictam quae est inventio quantitatis horarum diei
   et noctis, et summae provenienti aggregabis".
[148: expanded]
166: clause "et haec sunt Geuzaar pl'arum" omitted. Table in its place.
178: + longitudinem cum sua 12'a quae est inter solem et lunam.
190c: -- "horas finis [(cust.:) eclipsis adde quoque" on 144vb.
 /(201a:) "[sicut sunt in or]dine. Deinde differentiam" on 145ra.
208b: fig. at end of this paragraph.
225: + "quod patebit si aequaveris..."

Nc:
-- Many glosses, some perh. in text-hd. Within the text some chapters
   omitted, but there is no mechanical loss.
138b: last clause "Nunc vero--regula" omitted.
166: list, not table.
200-206: in one piece, 206 present.
48: preceded by a small space, appar. same hand as the rest.
f.59r+, a calendar; f.62r+, other interesting canons, miscellany.
   See description.

Nu:
Headings cursive, in the margins, all marked <<...>>. Several are faint.
"none seen": mostly for inner margins, where captions may be hidden
   in the photo.
166: the table is in the lower margin, in the hand that also wrote the
   headings.
206 present.
225: ends "quod patebit -- locum illum".
228 present.
Subscription is in text-hand.

F:
The additions to the rubrics are normal glosses. They were recorded
   (within <<>>) where they look like supplements, but not when they
   stand in the opposite margin.  Even some of the relevant ones may
   have been overlooked, since most are faint in the film.
[42: begins in context, first letter painted out & a rubric in mg.]
52-57: rubric thoughtlessly rptd. from "Cum cuiuslibet gr. scire volueris".
   -- Most rubrics seem to be echos of the chapter-incipits.
61: Blank space of some lines betw. l.4 "provenientem" and l.5 "dividens".
144: adds, "sed 7 planetae contra ordinem nituntur signorum, solum.. (?)
   que capud draconis cum mundo circulariter (!) incipiens (in sapiens
   F a.c., in sipiens p.c.) ut draconem ab ariete".
166: list, not table.
258: adds, "et ecce figura praecedentium doctrinarum", fig. later, on 104r.

Ob:
[f. 10r, three precession values, gloss?]
14: + "quia diebus eius per 7 divisis unus supererit".
52+: with the small sine figure, otherwise usual in Italian manuscripts.
59: table above, within 58.
138b: last clause "Nunc vero -- subditur regula" omitted.
142: the addition "Cui certo loco..." is here a gloss by the main hand.
166: list, not table.
211-13 not in place. [-- on next page, in mg., by a contemp. hand.]
236-58: On 12ra, after 241 (no break in text, just an alinea-sign) the
   passage "Primo climate". This ends on 12rb and is followed by a blank
   space of about half a column. Then follow Cb242+, without any sort of
   chapter-heading.  So this break has been treated as unintentional.

Ok:
Text has some extra text incorporated, and it seems to have many
   small aberrations.  Below I note the glosses inserted in the canons;
   the text of entire additional canons is written out in the inventory.
27: + "et hoc est quia duo anni Graecorum praeterierant quando
   tabulae inceperunt".
34-5: 34 is left out (this may have passed unnoticed elsewhere!!); 35 is
   a little re-stated, and lacks the clause "Et haec eadem -- habeatur".
59: table is in its place.
142: lin.13 "fuerit subtrahe", then a 15-line gloss in context, on
   interpolation, "Si multiplicaveris minuta argumenti --- secundum
   proportionem A ad B".  This text is underscored.
166: not quite a table, but a line for each value. Saturn, Jupiter,
   Venus and Mercury only.
170-175: several glosses in context, marked by underscoring.
176-190d: ditto.  In !86, "in cano() Marsiliensis: cum fuerit prope caput
   vel caudam infra gra 13".

Oc:
Order of leaves: 1-2, 5-8, 3-4, 9 etc.
After 51b, gloss with ref. to two missing canons near the end.
59: table at foot of page.
109-10: not in their place, but at the very end of the text.
166: table in its place.
206: present.
223b: present.
After 223b, without break, the incipits of 49 and 51a, a few words only.
225: + "quod patebit -- locum illum".
228: present.
230: gloss, "Franco ordinavit istos 2 canones..."
236: gloss, "Finit alius".
51a--167: chapter-sign but no real break.
169: at end, "144 (?) ultimus".
ssc: bottom of page, location uncertain.
Continues in the Campanus-chronology, which is off-set just like another
   chapter.

H:
c.93-(114) are gone.
A few proper rubrics; the rest, underscored in the margin, have here been
   put into <<>>. These were put in the spaces between the glosses, so
   they are later than the glosses; still the hand may be the same, and
   the same as the main hand.
25/26: no chapter-break; the mg. shows the hdg. "Inventio annorum Graecorum
   per annos Arabum".
36/37: ditto, hdg. "Inventio annorum Alexandri per annos Arabum".
59: Kardaga-table stands after 63.
64: Hdg. not underscored.
92 <**> (114): c.92 until bottom of 8v, then a blank half-line as if for
   a chapter-break.  On 9r, last bit of 114 "gradibus adiunge inventis",
   then 115+ as usual.
116b: underscored hdg. "nota secunda", no chapter-break.
121: until "partes horarum illius diei", continuing into a dittography from
   119-20, "dividens habebis horas" until the end of 120. Then (again)
   121+ as usual. The hdg. is against the first copy of 121; the second copy
   has no heading.
126, ssc.: hand neither text nor glossator.
139/140: new line, no hdg nor initial.
143: ends "minus sex signis".
179a+: three small leaves inserted (as f.14a-c) with further canons in
   different hands, the text-hand among them. A gloss carries the date
   1244-?45.  Not registered, since they are not in the context.
206: present, no hdg.
220/221: plus three small leaves (18a-c) with diags and a gloss in
   another hand, not registered.
50b: present.
244: paragraph-sign before "Sit circulus ABCD", plus the hdg. "De figura
   sequenti" [in the margin], but no chapter-break.
260: (bottom of 21r) gloss in mg., mentioning "elgeib", not registered.
Extra pieces: a lot of them also in ms. Ef.
   28v-29r: eclipse canon same as Et,72v, some explications not present.
   29v...33r:    ditto, same as Et, -74r-, longer?
   33r: two canons as in Ma.

Op:
Beginning missing, text begins in c.8.
Room for rubrics, mostly vacant: this was noted as "-".
Text of many incipits and explicits is re-stated.
51b': until "dicta sufficiant"; 51b", from "Nunc autem".
   Space for rubric, plus room for large initial, before 51b".
66: addition is set off just by means of a ch-sign.
78a/b: no break.
87/88, no break.
148, long explicit: "et quod provenit post augmentationem vel deminutionem
   erit verissimus locus illius planetae cuius certum locum quaesivisti".
166: list, not table.

Oq:
Selection concerning eclipses, with a later hdg mentioning Profatius
(obviously a popular ascription in English manuscripts).
190d: broken off at end of leaf, rest of the para. is added as a gloss.

Od:
Rubrics generally missing, spaces left; noted as "-".
21: after "195 adde", a two-line gloss in context.
59: table in its place.
166: table (without frame), in its place.
206: present.
50a: adds "quia Romani ponunt bisextum in Februario et Graeci in Decembri".

Os:
31: there is an initial with a model for it, but it is small; the
writing looks continuous, and a heading is absent.
-- A lot of the headings might as well be glosses in the context, and
some were no doubt meant as such. No distinction was atempted.

Ot:

ff. 66 (c.(229)-259) and 67 (c.211-(229)) were interchanged before being
numbered.
14 adds two lines: "hoc est quia cum -- superabundat unum".
59: rubric for table, "Tabula kardagarum, Rubricha".
166: list, not table.
178: + "longitudinem cum sua duodecima".

O:
Canons along with tables, placed conveniently, with some disorder as
   the result.
After 16: 16a added in lower mg. in glossator's hand.
43 and 42: in main hd. but out of context, alongside tables on 18r and 18v.
After 39: another copy of 43 added in lower mg. by a later glossator.
39,37+: the wrong order is well established.
59: table in its place.
85b-87: on 27r-28v (in its place) and a duplicate on 45va-b, also
   in text-hand.
139: 46rb, first 7 lines with the wrong hdg., all marked "vacat". 46va,
   text over again, without a hdg.
221: spells "annos expanxos"
T82 (92r) has a star "Corbeillo del balestiero" (= ? ballistarii). 
   [=Kunitzsch  XIV,26; also in Pd]
161-62: 75rb, duplo on 95v.
206: present.
228: present.
223a-b: absent.

Oy:
59: table above, within c.58.
143,10-147,3 on a separate leaf but in the main hand, supplementing an
   omission.
166: table, within this chapter.
194: last clause omitted.
206: present.
228: present.

S:
First 5 leaves partly blurred by a large dark stain.
14: adds "quia diebus...unus supererit".
59: table above, within 58.
98/99: rubric and room for initial, but no change to new line.
138b: last sentence "Nunc vero ... regula" omitted.
166: list, not table.
218: hdg. added as a later gloss in mg.: "Scientia apparitionis
   planetarum et occultationis eorum".

Ow:
Partial rubrics in <> are those hidden in the binding.
The rubricator, at least, had an extra source, cf. below.
Rubrics in margins, or in spaces accidentally empty, all in one
   rubricator's hand. This may be the same same as the main hand, but the
   rubrics are secondary even to some marginal glosses, as is seen e.g.
   on 89r, 93r-v.
   Thus, extra rubrics in the middle of a continuous text were not taken to
   constitute chapter-breaks.
Refs. to "alia littera" in rubricator's hand (e.g. concerning c.49+, on 89v).
"Arabum" mostly written as just "A".
14: adds "quia diebus eius per 7 divisis unus supererit".
25/26: rubric "Ad inveniendum ..." in margin, but no new-line nor
   big initial.
42/43: rubric for 43, no chapter-break.
43: repeated as a marginal gloss at the start of c.44, displacing the hdg.
   of c.44.
78b: rubric, no chapter-break.
117: ditto.
125: ditto.
138b": from "Nunc (Cum Ow) vero qualiter". This was perhaps displaced
   by mistake: the 'Cum' fits 139 as is usual.
166: list, not table.
167-9: added in mg. below 170+ in glossator's hand.
171a: rubric, no chapter-break.
206: added as a gloss in mg., near end of 205.
210: a largish initial; here recorded as a normal chapter-break.
228: present.
50b: added in mg. after 50a.

Oe:
Order of leaves: -65-67-66-68-69-71-70-72-.
51b: not present after 48.
59: table below, within c.65.
166: table.
223b: present.
225: adds "quod patebit -- locum illum".
228: present.
50b: present.
167 init.: First few lines, then Cb51a.

Pc:
One or more leaves missing between f.54 and f.55 (before c.221).
Ditto between f.58 and f.59 (c.207,6/c.187,5)
Ditto after f.64 (canon for tables of "Iohannes".)
Some of the earlier canons appear as marginal glosses, among others not
   recognised; examples below.
15-16: below c.1+.
224: incipit abnormal; explicit like ms.H.
169: explicit "si sederit deo" as in ms.H1.
244: First clause, "Propositae ... demonstratio", missing.
Missing: 179a-185, 206, 214-20, 223b, 232-5.

Pd:
16a: in lower mg., inserted after c.15, perhaps in main hand.
45 lin.15: in context, "Vel sic in alia littera..." + 9 lines deleted.
59: table in its place.
117-8: in upper mg., inserted after c.116b, perhaps by main hand.
   First line gone, uncertain whether there was a rubric.
166: a table, in its place.
206: present.
(244): a few words only, until "supra centrum".
223a: the hdg. is by a glossator, inserted above the bit from 244.
228: present.

Pf:
Only exemplars for headings, in one glossator's hand, at bottoms of
   pages and/or near the paragraphs. The latter were used where both were
   present: such pairs are mostly quite similar. The placement is tentative.
16: new line before the last few words, "praesentis--incepti".
26: initial omitted: the cut is inconspicuous but certain.
41: omitted.
102/103 are split up, and the following headings misplaced.
158,159: an extra canon, with a part on each side of 159.
166: list, not table.
183-185: not in their place.
191-2: with the rubric belonging to 193.

N:
No large initials, but the chapter-hdgs are conspicuous.
Some standard words in the hdgs. are much abridged; the manner seems
   consistent, and most abbreviations  were tacitly expanded.
51a and 49+: in this order.
51b: whole text, in the normal manner. A duplicate of the later part,
   "Nunc autem de caelestium ... habetur notitia" is used as incipit for 52+.
126: ends, "supra docuimus, et habebis altitudinem, et haec est vera et
   facilis doctrina super tabulas primi mobilis".
138b': ends at "dicta sufficiant". The new chapter begins with 138b" =
   "Nunc autem...".
144: much abridged.
166: list, not table.
[185: ends, "Hec diversitas asp. in eclipsi solis tantum est necessaria"]

Xj:
The earlier rubrics have exemplars at bottoms of pages, differences
   few or none.
78b: Mixed rubric, from where?
126: text-hand adds "Sequitur 3'a pars", then follows the rubric for
   the next chapter.
166: table, inserted a few lines before the end.
206: present.
223b: present.
225: adds "quod patebit -- locum illum".
228: present.
235: omits the last "et eius gradum -- praecedentibus".

Pl:
Beginning (c.127+) complete, but earlier part possibly gone.

Xm:
Few rubrics in their place. A few others added in margin, in ?two different
   hands perh. contemp. with main text.  c.98, same in text and margin;
   c.99, in text only.
The transition c.20/c.66 occurs within one page; nothing has been lost.
166: list, not table.
Missing: c.21-66, 236-260, but no mechanical loss.
Extra text (90r+): like Et.

R:
First rubric, 15th c., top mg.
Rubrics are in spaces at the start of paragraphs, as usual, or in the margin,
   or partly in the margin, according to where there was room. All rubrics
   seem to be in the same hand.
59: table below, after 63.
60: no rubric: the space was ?forgotten, and the margin is taken up by
   a gloss. This may show that the rubrics are secondary to the glosses.
   Still the rubrics are in a contemporary hand.
125: last words "in p.r.d.e." left out; this occurs elsewhere. The incipits
   and explicits are often altered.
10r: example mentioning Marseille, Hereford, Toledo, and Arin.
166: list, not table.
171a: rubric in mg., of usual type, but no newline nor initial.

Xn:
97: last phrases, "iunge ea..." replaced by a copy of the final phrase
   of Cb96, "et sic habebis elevationes i.g. cum suis minutis".
104,106: small clauses appended, "et habebis partes horarum noctis",
   "et habebis numerum horarum noctis aequalium".
126: missing.
166: list, not table.
167: ?red note in mg.: "Iste canon est extraordinarius, sed tamen in
   hoc loco est necessarius".
178-, additional canons on 11r: ?red gloss in lower mg., "Hii duo canones
   non sunt de libro, et tamen hic competunt".
192: says "6/12 signs" for 180/360 degs.

Pq:
166: table, in its place.
228: present.

Xr:
Text badly spelt.
This is likely to be an early version: incipits and explicits are much
   simpler than in the majority of mss. - The comparison as to what
   chapters correspond to those of the standard version was carried as
   far as possible, but the deviations were not noted except in cases
   of doubt.
From about c.179 on, the text is close to standard.
Most of the instructions for interpolation are left out, a general one
   is added after c.78.
The rubrics mostly repeat the incipits. The latter look as if they had been
   rubrics, then transcribed into the text.
The unit radius is 60 everywhere, instead of 150 (e.g. c.62-3, c.74,
   107, etc.)
12: only "Nunc ad eorum accedamus regulas".
17-20: drastically ?abbreviated.
36: much altered.
74: "secundum ha()ibe(n) Abimansoris admirabilis conciderac()ois est 23 gra
   et 33m(); secundum Azarchelem est 23 gra et 33 m() et 30 secundorum,
   q(ui) omnibus verior est".
94: adds "Hic attende motum sphaerae, ubi ille gradus dicitur prior qui
   alium praecedit in ortu".
95: adds "Hoc etiam dicitur arcuare gradus ascensionum".
99: has an incipit resembling 98. The whole thing is probably an abridgment.
140: Toledo mentioned, no example for other cities.
f.42r-v: Albatenian latitude canons, like some extra ones in ms.H.
   The normal Khwarizmian canons, Cb165-6, are absent.
>> Cf., generally, the set of tables containing "Circulus ad Caturcum".
199c: smallish initial, no rubric, appar. no newline intended.
214-220: one-line small initials in mg., not in the usual places, and not
   taken to constitute chapter-breaks.
223a: newline and small initial before "Unde ille planeta".
224: absent.
123: smallish initial, nothing else.
Cb236-60 missing.
The last chapter, 48+51b', enda in "dicta sufficiant". Still it may be a
   left-over from a version that continued into Cb52.

Xt:
Initials (some not executed); spaces for rubrics were not filled in.
f.117v, bottom mg., near Cb126: "Cum 12 domos placuerit adaequare", 7-line
   gloss on use of ?astrolabe.
166: list, not table.
f.119r, bottom mg., near Cb170, "Cum in quolibet mense", 5-line abridgment
   of Cb167-8.
f.119v, bottom mg., near Cb186, the usual "Cum volueris scire colores".
208b: new-line but no large initial.
Text stops c.229 lin.3 "et qui" at bottom of 121rb.  121v is blank.

Px:
51b: room for a large initial in this paragraph, uncertain for what.
59: table in its place.
166: list (not table), set off by new-line but without a large initial.
203b,3-204,1: not in text, so any chapter-break before 204 will have been
   hidden. But probably there was none.

Xb:
14: adds "quia diebus eius per 7 divisis unitas supererit".
59: table in its place.
138b': until "dicta sufficiant"; then 138b", "Nunc vero".
166: list, not table.
179a-185: in the text-hand or a contemporary one, on its own leaf (f.13)
   inserted before f.14r, which contains Cb176-8, then immediately Cb167-9.
   At the beginning of Cb167, a hand which may be the usual glossator's
   hand has made a reference to the insert.
206: present.
228: present.

Xc:
Some headings added in empty spaces or in the margin, in a hand that may
   be contemporary with the main hand or slightly later. No headings in
   the later part.
59: table in its place.
166: list, not table.
206 (not in the inventory): inserted in upper mg., with a mark after Cb205.
   It adds "cuius causa est quia motus lunae est tertiusdecuplus ad
   motum solis".
50b (not in the inventory): inserted in upper mg., with a mark after Cb50a.
f.19v, central mg., gloss mentioning Toulouse Tables.
f.9r, right mg., f.17r, right and bottom mgg., glosses with reff. to other
   books.  9r has a ref. to Campanus.  The hand could be the same as in
   Par.lat. 16658, e.g. 115r and 137v+, with the same kind of refs. - The
   latter are by Peter of Limoges (Manuscrits Dates).

D:
No rubrics.
Many canons less than the full text, but those present are much
   like standard.
51b: abridged, and ends, "sed prius de motu planetarum". Then 127, which
   begins, "Post notitiam inventionis annorum Arabum".
166': until "horum duorum"; then 166": "Et haec...", and the list of auges.
f.44v: gloss, longitude of Francia from Toledo, 12 degs. 45 min.
36: adds the sentence "Et nota quod in annis Arabum operandum est semper
   cum imperfecto".
f.47v, lower mg. near the end: gloss (but in main hd.) containing a
   paraphrase of Cb34, plus other small notes in main hd.

Xd:
Text leaves off one-third down f.216r (Cb53 lin.2 "argumenti signo",
   rest of page blank, glosses on 216v.
The headings for 49+ seem to be in a 15th-c. hand, whereas the earlier ones
   look like the text-hand.

X:
166: a table, inside the text.
206: present.
223b: present.
225: adds "quod patebit...locum illum".

Pm1:
First hdgs.: two different ones, later hds.
The remaining rubrics could be by the text-hand. They seem to be
   extempore extracts of the canons, made to fit the space available,
   and are quite faulty; but the main text is not particularly bad.
f.26r+: latitudes, like H,25v+. In this text, large "Et"s have a peculiar
   sign, somewhat like "q(uia)" but with a stroke across the "q". Probably
   an "et" was intended in all these cases.

Pm2:
An old ms. but with a text appar. CLOSE TO THE LATER PARISIAN FAMILY.
   Should be examined soon!
Hdgs for 13, 15, 32... in a contemporary hybrid ?ecriture meridionale,
   here shown in <<>>. The rest of the hdgs are in the text-hand.
Hdgs for 139+ in a book-hd (also meridionale?)
   unlike the text-hd; these hdgs were also put into <<>>.
47 (not in the list) occurs as a gloss on 55v, lower mg.
   There is a lot of glosses, not quite boring. The hand looks mid-13th c.,
   probably later than the main hand.
59: table in its place, no versed-columns.
166": begins "Et haec sunt Geuzahar planetarum", then a list.
   Break doubtful: there is room for an initial, but it was not filled in,
   and there is no room for a heading.
f.79r, gloss, "Regula Massiliensis vel Parisiensis", visibilities.
221: the main hand changes (between f.79v and 80r) from a Carolingian to a
   nice early Gothic. This contains one more rubric, then only vacats.
   Room was left for one-line large initials (the earlier ones were
   two-line); none of the one-line initials were filled in.
   One the last page (84r) two of the earlier hands seem to re-appear in
   other connexions; so all these hands are likely to be contemporary.
50b: present!!!
228 (not in the list) occurs as a gloss inserted before 226. This may or
   may not be the result of a collation with a later ms.

Pt:
14: explicit "unum"; gloss in mg., "quia diebus eius...remanet unus",
   certainly from collation with another ms.
43 (not in the list): occurs as a gloss in mg. below Cb39, and is
   marked "canon 13'us".
Many rubrics have models in the mg.; an error of the rubric against the
   mg. is in Ca44, otherwise they are the same unless noted.
59 table: no large initial, but a model in mg. for the rubric.
89: rubric illegible, marginal model used; this was done for other rubrics
   on this stretch (and vice versa, some cut-off marginals were supplemented
   from the rubrics).
102 gloss, hand same as for 14: "Al() R(ubri)ca, De inventione partium
   horarum diurnarum".
A number of glosses refer to numbered chaps of "Astrologia".
166: both a list and a table, and both in text-hd.
-- Text generally close to standard.
224: gloss mentioning Magister Jo. Campanus. (33v)
ssc.: there is an alternative in a cursive hd. After the ssc., a "Tabula
   retrogradationis planetarum" in another hand. No more in film.

Pv:
Headings in text-hand, just underscored.
14: adds "quia diebus eius per 7 divisis unus supererit".
21: present.
59: table missing, heading "Tabule kardagarum" struck out.
166: list, not table.
199a lin.19 "accipies" <-- 1 leaf lost --> 202 lin.9 "eisdem addideris".
Extra canons: inventory much like ms. H.

G:
Beginning gone, text starts in c.184 lin.5 "adde".
223b: present.
225: ends, "quod patebit...locum illum".
228: present.

Ro:
The headings are in the text-hand, at the tail of the preceding paragraph,
   all delimited by an R() except the one for Cb13-14. These R()s were
   left out in the transcription. The headings generally seem to be
   extracts of the corresponding incipits.
14: adds "quia diebus ... supererit dies".
138b': until "dicta sufficiant"; then 138b".
166: list, not table.
228: present.
236': begins "Quoniam igitur ad sinus demonstrationem praesens spectat
   intentio, videndum est quid sit sinus", etc., like Cb236 lin.5ff.
   A few insignificant abridgments in the following.

Sg:
Some exposures blurred or shaken, almost illegible. I put a "?" where
   I cannot see whether a rubric is present or not. The chapter delimitation
   is safe enough.
-- The headings are now taken from another film, which is adequate.
The headings are generally similar to ms. Vf.
Until c.44, hdgs. are in the mg. with a prefixed R(). They were put into <<>>,
   and the R()s were left out.
From c.52, hdgs. are at the tops of pages, generally one or two, apparently
   pertaining to the first canon(s) on that page. These hdgs. are marked
   "(:top)". The assignment to single canons is not certain.
From c.144, hdgs. again in the mg., apparently in different hands, some
   with leading R()s. These were treated like the early hdgs.
<<21>> on a separate slip, perhaps in text-hd., with an insertion-mark.
33': until lin.12 "primum sub primis"; then 33".
45 lin.17 "minue": after this, in context, 5 lines "Et si <-> remanebunt
   tunc eas abice -- et cum tabulis", marked with "va--cat" in mg., hardly
   legible in film.
<<47>> on same slip as <<21>>, with mark referring to here.
88': longer than usual. Incipit and explicit are recognisable, but the
   rest of the text is illegible.
115: adds "per regulam praedictam quae est inventio quantitatis horarum
   diei et noctis, et summae <--> aggregabis".
160: adds "Sed motus argumenti Veneris et Mercurii per se facile patent
   quia extrahuntur ex tabulis".
178: adds "longitudinem cum sua duodecima quae est inter solem et lunam".
225': until lin.2 "ingressurus sit", then, senselessly, provision for
   another large initial of "si".
After 235: a piece with another copy in Ma.

Vb:
51b": from "Nunc autem"; with room for large initial but no rubric.
52: also with room for large initial, and with the usual rubric.
68: ends "ab aequinoctiali linea". Gloss with variant ending "a loco...".
cc. (98)-(111) occur in two copies, on f.17 and f.18. Both continue c.98
   textually. Only f.17 connects to f.19 textually (in c.111); but it has
   cc.109+/107+ in reverse, whereas f.18 has the normal order. f.17 is an
   insert, with the loose side protruding between ff. 14 and 15. --
      Probably f.18 is the first attempt, substituted by f.17, even if
   this shows the wrong order of canons. An error on f.18 is an unfinished
   diagram that occurs again, finished, on f.19; could this have been the
   cause for re-writing?
166": from "Et haec sunt Ge(n)zahar planetarum", plus the table. Two-line
   space for initial, at bottom of page; the other spaces are mostly 3-line.
206: present.
208b: until lin.4 "nota la<**>" at bottom of 39r; 39v-40v blank (40v in
   film, rest acc. to Silverstein).

Vf:
Many Italianizing spellings, "fisam" for "fixam", etc., here normalized.
14: adds "quia diebus eius per 7 divisis unus supererit".
<<43>>: in lower mg., contemp. hand, inserted before c.37.
96-97: gloss "Isti duo canones non habent veritatem, sicut dicit ...axinus".
<<117-118>>: like <<43>>, inserted after 116b.
166: list, not table.
225: adds "quod patebit...ad locum illum".
Extra piece before 230 (as in ms. Ej); this has taken over the rubric
   of 230, and 230 has taken over the one for 232.
16a, 21: with an insertion-mark and a direction (in text-hd.) to put them
   both before c.22.
Last piece on differences of eras: <<>> denote corrections, partly in
   erasure.

Vh:
Some canons missing, and the text looks faulty in detils.
Headings absent, except the first one; spaces for large initials.
<<>> for a few marginals that look as if intended for headings.
26: no space, but new-line and first letter left out.
59: table in its place.
235: ends "sicut ostendemus in sequentibus", adapting to the placement
   of this chapter.
96-126: several canons unexpectedly missing, no mechanical gaps.
144: adds "sed retro numerande (!)".
186-190d: not in its place, no gap in ms.
192: uses signs instead of degrees.
196': ends "Cuius rei tale subditur exemplar (+ figure from c.199b)".
207': until lin.13 "versus", then without a break, 196" (from "diameter").
208b: a chapter apart; the rest of 207 is absent.
--> The exemplar no doubt had two leaves transposed, thus:
   ...195-196' // 196"-198; 199a-c; // 200-205; 207' // <207"-208a>; 208b...

Vj:
Nice French-looking hd., late 13th c., no rubrics nor exemplars though
   spaces are often left for rubrics.
21 (not in the list): in lower mg. after c.17-20, in glossator's hand.
22: last few wds missing, added secondarily.
47 (not in the list): in mg., added after c.46, in another glossator's hand.
235: ends "sicut ostendemus in sequentibus".
107: first words gone, supplied as "Cum autem -- altitudinem solis" in mg.
   The text continues c.106; any chapter-break has disappeared too.
117-118 (not in the list:) in lower mg., inserted after c.116b, in a
   late-14c glossator's hand unlike those for cc.21 and 47.
151: ends "sicut fit in {{Saturno}} <<aliis planetis>>", a relic of what?
166: list, not table.
208b: new-line ( text starts besides the figure); first letter in ?text-hd.
   but out of context, as if a large initial had been envisaged.
167-169: adds "si cederit (!) deo".
209: starts besides (empty) figure for 199c, with a blank line, but no
   large initial. A chapter-break was still assigned here.

Vl:
43: absent in its place.
50b: present.
59: space left for table.
166: table, not text.

Vm:
The text leaves out the planetary chaps. 139-166; no mechanical loss.
No headings.
Chapter-limits were taken as usual, thus, as newlines plus large initials.
   A lot of the expected limits are not marked or only marked with capitals
   and slight spaces within the line. Only some of the instances are
   mentioned below.
23-30: c.28 faintly set off, no newline nor large initial.
39-41: c.40, same.
138b, transition to 170 on same page, no delimitation except the usual
   chapter-limit.
223a+: c.49 set off with an alinea-sign, no newline nor large initial.

Vp:
144: adds "ab ariete principium eius numerando".
166: list, not table.
170-175: c.173 moved to the end of this chapter.
208b: adds "supple illa quae immediate praecedit".

Vz:
Spaces for rubrics, but they were not used, and there are no exemplars.
Fcb123, gloss: "Ista figura pertinet ad capitulum de inventione altitudinis
   per umbram".
138b': until "sufficiant", then 138b".
166: list, not table.
228: present.

Vr:
Nice copy, text looks good too.
166: list, not table.
f.33va lin.13, Italianism "cognosses".

Vn:
166: list.
(179b): stops at lin.3-4 "quod in earum directo fuerit".

Q:
Some rubrics are in erasure, but in the same hand as the rest and, probably,
   as the text.
117-118 (not in the list): inserted in lower mg., after 116, with the hdg.
   "Ad idem inveniendum per tabulas".
166: list.
Near 232-5, 20v, mg. in a hd. coeval with text-hd. but not the same:
   (1) canon "Si volueris invenire motum 8 sphaerae ... aut planetae illius
       cuius vis locum habere".
   (2) Cb167-9.

Vw:
14: adds "quia diebus eius per 7 divisis unus supererit".
27: adds "quia nit (?) anni Graecorum praeterierunt quando inceperunt
   alii (!) Arabum, quia 90 anni Graecorum transierant quando tabulae
   inceperunt".
31: No large initial, but a rubric and an alinea-sign in the running line.
   This was not taken as a chapter-break, since it would be likely to
   disappear in the next copy. It seems to be the only case in this
   witness.
138b': until "dicta sufficiant"; the sentence "Nunc vero" is absent.
166: list.
235: until lin.6 "Si vero ortus est<**>", end of ms.; last bit of text
   plus any subscription gone.

Vx:
138b': until "dicta sufficiant", then 138b".
166: list.
206: present.
226: continues from 225.

Vy:
Incipits and explicits rather aberrant.
30: adds "et facta divisione per 4 et si remanserint plures 2 quartis, pro
   una die sunt addendae".
69: new-line and alinea-sign, no rubric or initial.
88: missing.
140: perhaps a break here: there is a large initial, but without room
   provided for it by the text-hand. There is a rubric too, but properly
   belonging to c.141, where it is repeated.
144: embedded a note that 12 signa = 11 s 29 degs 59 min 60 scds.
148: expanded; not the usual explicit.
166: until "Et haec sunt loca Geuzahar planetarum", values missing.
-- Some non-universal chapter-breaks are introduced without rubrics.
   In the vacats, the following rubric is sometimes wrongly introduced,
   e.g. in 199a. Was the exemplar for the rubrics different from that of
   the text? The rubrics do not seem to be in the text-hand.
225: adds "quod patebit si certificaveris planetam ad locum illum".
c.235/c.1+: transition within a column, no mechanical displacement of
   leaves.

Wa:
Some rubrics have exemplars in mg., wording like the rubrics; not registered.
14: adds "quia diebus...supererit".
51b: absent!
87: adds "et haec omnia patent in ascensionibus signorum in circulo
   obliquo in tabulis omnium climatum".
166': lacks the list of nodes.
206: present.
225: adds "quod patebit...locum illum".
228: present.

We:
Text sloppy, several explicits are incomplete.
140': until lin.6 "hora quaesita"; the example for Cremona is missing.
144/145: no new-line, smallish initial set off with a stroke.
151: last clause "non curantes..." omitted.
160, last part, values in the order Venus, Mercury, Jupiter, Mars, then
   added "quae si a medio motu solis unius diei subtraxeris, habebis quod
   quaesisti".
161: ends "a 3 in 6 descendens", rest missing, as often.
170: last part re-arranged.
176'-178': re-arranged and paraphrased.
179a'-184': ditto.
Then follows a paraphrase of 186-190 etc., without much affinity elsewhere;
   transcription stopped at present.
192: "6 signs" for "180 degs.", etc.
   Otherwise c.191-198 are about standard.

Wo:
22-23: Last part of 22 and beginning of 23, left out in context, were
   added in lower mg. by the text-hand.
59: table above c.58.
142: the appendix "cui certo loco...aliis planetis" is in mg., in text-hd.
182b lin.4 "et quod inde provenerit": with a gloss in upper mg., text-hd.,
   with a "correctio secundum magistros Bononienses".
199c end, rubric: "Figura sequens demonstrat eclipsim solis"; 206 end,
   rubric also referring to the figure. The figure is on the next page.
208b end, rubric, ref. to fig. of lunar eclipse, which is on next page.
228: present.

Cu:
12': lacks last clause "Unde in annis..."
14: adds "quia diebus...unus supererit".
<<47>>: in lower mg., perhaps in the text-hd. With large initial, no doubt
   executed along with the rest.
166': the clause "Et haec s.g. planetarum", plus the values, are missing.
50b: present.
f.29v-30r: exposure absent. 29r ends in c.254 lin.7, and 30v starts with
   c.231 lin.2.

Ea:
Italian hand.
112 lin.4, "adde": adds "horas(?) omnes scilicet quae sunt super Toletum
   adde, vel ad aliam civitatem si feceris ad eam".
166': until lin.8 "horum duorum latitudines".
166": from lin.8 "Et haec", with the list of values (not a table).

Eb2:
Semicursive of the first half of the 13th c. Much fewer canons than in the
   standard text, but there is no mechanical loss.
The headings are all in the mg., in the same hands as the text, or in a
   contemporary one. Most of the inner margins are invisible in the film;
   chapters where the hdgs. could be hidden in this way are marked with ?.
166': until "horum duorum latitudines".
166": from "Et haec sunt", with a list of Geuzaars.
201a': until "ab una in aliam", then "<-> superius dictum est".
209: No chapter-break before this chapter.
216': until lin.4 "oritur mane", then a row of semicolons, rest of leaf
   blank.

Ld:
(209): until lin.2 "cupis".
216': last sentence, "velocitas...Venere", missing.
218': "Cum...investigare hoc, fac ut praedixi";
218": "Locum etiam cuiusvis planetae..."
-- this division perhaps due to chance.
f.77vb, end of "Azarcel de eclipsibus" and just before Cb224, a fragment
   from the end of Cb44, obviously a wrong interpretation of the exemplar.
225: ends "et remanebit hora etc.", last clause missing.